The United States is not as racially segregated as it once was, but according to Douglas S. Massey, Ph.D., a new sort of separation is taking its place, with money taking the place of skin color.
Massey, the Henry G. Bryant Professor of Sociology and Public Affairs at Princeton University, presented “The Changing Bases of American Segregation” at Fordham’s Rose Hill campus on Wednesday, Oct. 14. His lecture was the first annual urban studies lecture, and coincides with the inauguration of Fordham’s Urban Studies Master’s program.
In examining census data from the 20th century, Massey said that the early 1970s saw the highest levels of segregation between blacks and whites, and in some cities, the divisions were as high as apartheid-era South Africa. He called the years between 1900 and 1970 the “Era of Pervasive Racism” while 1970 the present is the “Era of Aversive Racism.” But although attitudes toward African Americans have improved remarkably (33 percent of whites disapprove of interracial marriage now, compared to 90 percent in 1964, for instance), Massey said we’re not out of the woods just yet.
“The feelings have not disappeared, even though the principles have pretty much gone away,” he said. “We are not a post-racial society. Race is transmuting. The meaning is changing, and it’s becoming a more complex construct. Principled racism is more or less dying out, and you can really see this if you look at cohort replacement, or older people versus younger people. The strongest single predictor for voting for Barack Obama was age.”
To find the places where desegregation has taken place the fastest, Massey, a past president of the Population Association of America, the American Sociological Association and the American Academy of Political and Social Science, suggested one look to towns with colleges, military bases or housing built before the 1970s. Many of these places are experiencing surges in Asian and Latino immigration, further complicating the picture.
But while Americans society is slowly integrating on the basis of race and ethnicity, it is going the other direction on class and education.
“The period from 1970 to the present was one of tremendous socioeconomic change. The United States became a vastly more unequal society over this period,” he said. “By the present time, we are more unequal in terms of income and wealth than any time since 1929. It’s as if all the equalizing policies of the New Deal have been wiped out, and in fact, many of those policies have been wiped out.”
As a result of this, he noted that whereas in 1970, the average poor person lived in a neighborhood that was about 13 percent poor, by 1990 the average poor person lived in a neighborhood that was 28 percent poor.
In addition, according to data collected from census tracts and counties, the level of ideological segregation spiked in 2000.
The rising income inequality is not solely responsible for segregation though, and Massey explained that in “The Effect of Density Zoning on Racial Segregation in U.S. Urban Areas,” a study he recently conducted, he found a direct relation between zoning restrictions that limit the density of suburbs to, say, one family houses, and the perpetuation of segregation patterns.
“What we need to look at more and more is not necessarily race and class separately, but race and class together. I think American society is increasingly beginning to segment on the basis of more complicated race/class interactions.”
